weapons of more distraction

oh they got tons of reasons why they can't find the weapons—he never had 'em, his scientists lied to him, he smuggled 'em out, he destroyed 'em all pre-invasion—but that's not the issue here now is it—the issue is, who's to blame in "intelligence" for "convincing the white house" that saddam was a threat? they say all the intelligence proved he had weapons... so far all the intelligence proves is that intelligence agents are full of shit. where'd this "evidence" come from & who can we string up for it, if they won't give us the bush admin, hmm?

in the meantime, america has confiscated thousands of guns in iraq in the last few months, and for some reason, are spending $20 million of our tax dollars on buying brand new guns to give to the iraqi police, rather than just giving them the firearms they've confiscated.

we went because saddam was a "threat," right folks? cuz to me, it kinda looks like we went to bolster the arms, contracting & energy industries. oh and speaking of which, look who's paying for bush's reelection...